Sunday, May 5, 2024

Interesting Prompt Patterns — Chain of Verification Pattern

 I was looking into hallucination-reducing techniques for prompting and came across “Chain of Verification” pattern. This blog post goes into an example of the “Chain of Verification” pattern.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lar3K2gN454&t

The Prompt

The actual prompt for this post is provided below. You can copy / paste it, and give it a try yourself. I will break down the prompt into it’s parts below.

I will give you a topic “TOPIC”, please summarize it . Your summary should be 3–5 paragraphs long and include only factual information that can be directly sourced from the Encyclopaedia Britannica. Now generate “N” questions that would verify the accuracy and completeness of your summary of the French Revolution. Then, answer the verification questions you generated to confirm the reliability of your summary. As part of answering the questions, please also provide brief reasoning for the answers. Then, based on your answers to the verification questions, please revise your initial summary to address any gaps or inaccuracies. Then review your revised summary. Does it satisfactorily address all the verification questions you generated? If so, provide the final version of your summary. Also, call out the main differences between the final summary and the initial summary. Ask me for the topic, and then follow the instructions as called out above.

Prompt Breakdown

Let’s break the prompt into parts.

Generate Initial Content

We parameterized the “TOPIC” so that we can re-use this prompt in many different situations.

I will give you a topic “TOPIC”, please summarize it . Your summary should be 3–5 paragraphs long and include only factual information that can be directly sourced from the Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Generate validation questions for the above

We parameterized the number of questions — “N” so that we can be flexible about how much verification we need. For simpler topics, N can be smaller, for more complex topics, N can be larger.

Now generate “N” questions that would verify the accuracy and completeness of your summary of the French Revolution.

Answer and justify your answers to validation questions

Then, answer the verification questions you generated to confirm the reliability of your summary. As part of answering the questions, please also provide brief reasoning for the answers.

Revise your summary

Then, based on your answers to the verification questions, please revise your initial summary to address any gaps or inaccuracies.

Confirm all initial verifications have been answered properly

Does it satisfactorily address all the verification questions you generated? If so, provide the final version of your summary.

Generate a diff for quick final manual validation

Also, call out the main differences between the final summary and the initial summary.

Ask user for inputs related to “TOPIC” and “N”

Ask me for the topic, and then follow the instructions as called out above.

Prompt Usage

I entered the above prompt into ChatGPT, and gave it the following inputs

Why did deep learning not become popular before 2012, 10 verification questions.

Below is the output from ChatGPT.

Deep learning, as a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), had been around for decades before its rise to prominence in 2012. However, several factors contributed to its limited popularity prior to that time:

Limited computational power: Deep learning models require significant computational resources to train effectively, especially with large datasets. Before 2012, the computational power needed for training deep neural networks was often prohibitively expensive and not widely accessible.

Sparse data: Deep learning algorithms thrive on large volumes of data to learn complex patterns and relationships. Prior to 2012, the availability of such vast datasets, particularly labeled data, was more limited compared to recent years. This scarcity hindered the training and performance of deep learning models.

Lack of breakthroughs: While the theoretical foundations of deep learning were established in the 1980s and 1990s, there were no major breakthroughs or significant advancements in algorithm design or training techniques until around 2012. These breakthroughs, such as the development of deep convolutional neural networks and improved training methods like backpropagation, played a crucial role in the resurgence of deep learning.

Limited awareness and interest: Before 2012, deep learning was not as widely known or discussed outside of academic circles and specialized research communities. The lack of awareness and interest in the potential applications of deep learning further contributed to its limited popularity.

Performance limitations: Early deep learning models often struggled to outperform traditional machine learning approaches on various tasks. This limited success hindered widespread adoption and investment in deep learning research and development.

In summary, the limited availability of computational resources, sparse data, lack of breakthroughs, limited awareness, and performance limitations were key factors that prevented deep learning from becoming popular before 2012. It wasn’t until advancements in computational technology, algorithm design, and data availability that deep learning gained widespread attention and adoption in the years following 2012.

Next up are the verification questions

What were some of the factors that limited the popularity of deep learning before 2012?

How did the computational requirements for training deep neural networks contribute to the limited popularity of deep learning before 2012?

What role did the availability of large datasets play in hindering the development of deep learning before 2012?

Can you explain why breakthroughs in algorithm design and training techniques were crucial for the resurgence of deep learning around 2012?

How did the lack of awareness and interest in deep learning impact its popularity before 2012?

What challenges did early deep learning models face in outperforming traditional machine learning approaches?

Can you elaborate on the theoretical foundations of deep learning and when they were established?

What were some of the limitations of computational technology that affected the popularity of deep learning before 2012?

How did the performance limitations of early deep learning models influence their adoption and investment?

What were some of the key advancements in computational technology and algorithm design that contributed to the rise of deep learning after 2012?

Then, answers to the verification questions

What were some of the factors that limited the popularity of deep learning before 2012? Answer: Before 2012, factors such as limited computational power, sparse data availability, lack of breakthroughs in algorithm design and training techniques, limited awareness and interest, and performance limitations hindered the popularity of deep learning.

How did the computational requirements for training deep neural networks contribute to the limited popularity of deep learning before 2012? Answer: Deep neural networks require significant computational resources for training, which were often expensive and not widely accessible before 2012. This limitation restricted the widespread adoption and development of deep learning models.

What role did the availability of large datasets play in hindering the development of deep learning before 2012? Answer: Deep learning algorithms thrive on large volumes of data to learn complex patterns and relationships. However, before 2012, the availability of such vast datasets, especially labeled data, was limited, hindering the development and training of deep learning models.

Can you explain why breakthroughs in algorithm design and training techniques were crucial for the resurgence of deep learning around 2012? Answer: Breakthroughs in algorithm design, such as the development of deep convolutional neural networks, and improved training techniques like backpropagation, were crucial for the resurgence of deep learning around 2012. These advancements significantly improved the performance and effectiveness of deep learning models.

How did the lack of awareness and interest in deep learning impact its popularity before 2012? Answer: Before 2012, deep learning was not widely known or discussed outside of academic circles and specialized research communities. The lack of awareness and interest in the potential applications of deep learning further contributed to its limited popularity.

What challenges did early deep learning models face in outperforming traditional machine learning approaches? Answer: Early deep learning models often struggled to outperform traditional machine learning approaches on various tasks due to performance limitations and the lack of breakthroughs in algorithm design and training techniques.

Can you elaborate on the theoretical foundations of deep learning and when they were established? Answer: The theoretical foundations of deep learning, such as neural network architectures and learning algorithms, were established in the 1980s and 1990s. However, it wasn’t until advancements in computational technology and algorithm design in the early 2010s that deep learning experienced a resurgence in popularity.

What were some of the limitations of computational technology that affected the popularity of deep learning before 2012? Answer: Before 2012, computational technology had limitations in terms of processing power and memory capacity, which made training deep neural networks prohibitively expensive and resource-intensive.

How did the performance limitations of early deep learning models influence their adoption and investment? Answer: The performance limitations of early deep learning models, coupled with the lack of significant breakthroughs, influenced limited adoption and investment in deep learning research and development before 2012.

What were some of the key advancements in computational technology and algorithm design that contributed to the rise of deep learning after 2012? Answer: After 2012, advancements in computational technology, such as the availability of graphics processing units (GPUs) and cloud computing, along with breakthroughs in algorithm design and training techniques, contributed to the rise of deep learning. These advancements enabled more efficient training of deep neural networks on large datasets.

Then we have the revised summary

Revised Summary:

Deep learning, a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), experienced limited popularity before 2012 due to several factors. Firstly, the computational power required for training deep neural networks was often prohibitively expensive and not widely accessible. Additionally, the availability of large datasets, essential for deep learning algorithms to learn complex patterns, was limited before 2012, hindering the development and training of deep learning models. Breakthroughs in algorithm design and training techniques, such as the development of deep convolutional neural networks and improved backpropagation methods, were crucial for the resurgence of deep learning around 2012.

Before 2012, deep learning was not widely known or discussed outside of academic circles and specialized research communities, contributing to limited awareness and interest in its potential applications. Early deep learning models also faced performance limitations, struggling to outperform traditional machine learning approaches on various tasks. Despite the theoretical foundations of deep learning being established in the 1980s and 1990s, significant advancements in computational technology and algorithm design were necessary for its widespread adoption.

The limitations of computational technology, including processing power and memory capacity, affected the popularity of deep learning before 2012. Additionally, the lack of significant breakthroughs and performance limitations of early deep learning models influenced limited adoption and investment in deep learning research and development. However, after 2012, advancements in computational technology, such as the availability of graphics processing units (GPUs) and cloud computing, along with breakthroughs in algorithm design and training techniques, contributed to the rise of deep learning. These advancements enabled more efficient training of deep neural networks on large datasets.

Lastly, we have a diff of the different summaries for quick and final manual verification.

Main Differences: The revised summary incorporates more detailed explanations of the factors that limited the popularity of deep learning before 2012, including computational requirements, data availability, lack of breakthroughs, awareness, and performance limitations. It also highlights the importance of advancements in computational technology and algorithm design in the resurgence of deep learning after 2012. Overall, the revised summary provides a more comprehensive understanding of the evolution of deep learning.

References

  1. The YouTube video “Chain-of-Verification (COVE) Reduces Hallucination in Language Models” -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lar3K2gN454&t
  2. The arXiv paper “Pattern-Aware Chain-of-Thought Prompting in Large Language Models” 5 discusses extending the COVE approach by incorporating pattern-aware prompting to improve reasoning performance.
  3. Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verification https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09561

Andrew Ng on Agentic Workflows

I recently saw a video by Andrew Ng on Agentic workflows, which was fairly enlightening, especially if you are looking to learn more about LLM-based Agents. You can watch the full video at the link below. Following is a short summary of the video.

A New Way to Interact with Large Language Models

Agentic workflows fundamentally change how we interact with LLMs by making it an iterative process. Instead of a one-shot prompt, users and LLMs engage in a back-and-forth conversation. The user provides an initial prompt, the LLM clarifies or asks questions, and then refines its response based on this conversation. This collaborative approach goes beyond simply generating text — it allows for a more nuanced and effective use of LLMs.

Agentic Workflows: A Paradigm Shift

Agentic workflows unlock a new range of capabilities for LLMs. Here are a few key design patterns Ng proposes:

  • LLMs as Code Reviewers: Imagine an LLM that can analyze its own code, find bugs and suggest fixes. This would be a game-changer for programmers!
  • Planning and Teamwork: LLMs can be used to plan complex tasks and collaborate with other AI agents to complete them. Ng describes a system where one LLM acts as a coder, writing code, while another acts as a reviewer, checking for errors.
  • LLMs and Other Tools: Agentic workflows can combine LLMs with specialized tools to create even more powerful workflows. For example, an LLM could write code and another tool could compile and run it.
  • Speed Over Perfection: Because agentic workflows involve frequent back-and-forth communication, it’s important for LLMs to prioritize speed over absolute perfection in their initial responses. This allows for faster iteration and refinement.

Conclusion: The Future of LLMs

Agentic workflows represent a significant step forward in unlocking the full potential of LLMs. Ng believes this approach is a stepping stone towards achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI). However, it also requires a change in mindset. We need to move away from expecting an immediate answer and embrace the collaborative nature of agentic workflows.

Overall, agentic workflows offer a promising new way to interact with LLMs, opening doors to a future of more powerful and versatile AI tools.

Saturday, May 4, 2024

Using ChatGPT as a Coding Assistant

Background

I recently took a small Coursera course on using ChatGPT for Python programming — “ Software Development with ChatGPT ”. In the past, I have used GitHub Copilot as a coding assistant, and I wanted to compare and contrast use of ChatGPT with CoPilot. The course focused on Python, and so the general focus of this post is Python as well. The suggestions may not necessarily translate well to other languages, since Python has a lot of representation in terms of source code on GitHub.

In this blog post, using a series of targeted questions, and their answers, we’ll explore the myriad ways in which ChatGPT, one of the most advanced language models available, can be harnessed as a powerful coding assistant — from automating repetitive tasks and generating boilerplate code to providing intelligent suggestions for optimization and refactoring.

“Image generated with Bing CoPilot”

How can ChatGPT assist in generating code for a Python project?

ChatGPT can be a valuable tool for generating code in Python projects. It can help with tasks such as:

  • Writing boilerplate code and scaffolding for new projects
  • Generating code for specific functionality based on prompts, like creating a web scraper or data processing script
  • Providing code examples and explanations to help understand programming concepts
  • Assisting with debugging by suggesting fixes for errors or optimizing inefficient code

Is there any use case when this can be better than CoPilot?

While GitHub Copilot is a powerful AI coding assistant, there are some cases where ChatGPT may be preferable:

  • ChatGPT can handle more open-ended prompts and provide more contextual explanations, whereas Copilot is better suited for autocomplete and syntax suggestions
  • ChatGPT may be better for generating code for complex, multi-file projects or prototyping new ideas, while Copilot shines for incremental code improvements
  • ChatGPT can be used for free, while Copilot requires a GitHub subscription

What are some advantages of using AI-assisted programming tools like ChatGPT?

Some key advantages of using AI coding assistants include:

  • Increased productivity by automating repetitive tasks and providing intelligent suggestions
  • Improved code quality by catching errors and suggesting optimizations
  • Faster prototyping and experimentation with new ideas
  • Enhanced learning and understanding of programming concepts

What are some common programming tasks that can be automated using AI tools?

AI tools like ChatGPT can automate a variety of programming tasks, including:

  • Generating boilerplate code and project scaffolding
  • Writing unit tests and documentation
  • Refactoring and optimizing existing code
  • Translating code between programming languages
  • Extracting insights and summaries from large codebases

What are some best practices for debugging and refining applications using AI?

Best practices for using AI in the debugging and refinement process include:

  • Carefully reviewing the AI-generated code and understanding its logic before integrating it
  • Thoroughly testing the AI-assisted code to ensure it meets requirements and doesn’t introduce new bugs
  • Providing clear and specific prompts to the AI to get the desired output
  • Continuously refining prompts and iterating on the AI-generated code

What is the recommended prompt structure when requesting code generation from ChatGPT?

When requesting code generation from ChatGPT, it’s recommended to provide a clear and detailed prompt that includes:

  • A description of the task or functionality to be implemented
  • Any relevant context or constraints (e.g., programming language, libraries to use)
  • Specific requirements or desired outcomes
  • Examples or sample inputs/outputs if applicable

What are some potential limitations or challenges when using ChatGPT for code generation?

Some potential limitations and challenges of using ChatGPT for code generation include:

  • Potential for generating code with bugs or security vulnerabilities if not carefully reviewed
  • Difficulty in generating complex, multi-file projects or integrating the AI-generated code into existing codebases
  • Potential for the AI to generate code that doesn’t fully meet the requirements or doesn’t scale well
  • Potential for the AI to generate code that is not optimized for performance or maintainability

What is the importance of practicing programming and prompting with ChatGPT?

Practicing programming and prompting with ChatGPT is important for a few reasons:

  • It helps you develop a better understanding of how the AI works and its capabilities and limitations
  • It allows you to refine your prompting skills and get better at communicating your requirements to the AI
  • It helps you build the necessary programming skills and knowledge to effectively review and refine the AI-generated code

How can ChatGPT assist in the code refactoring process?

ChatGPT can assist in the code refactoring process in several ways:

  • Identifying opportunities for code optimization and suggesting refactoring strategies
  • Generating alternative implementations or design patterns to improve code structure and maintainability
  • Providing explanations and examples to help understand the reasoning behind refactoring decisions
  • Automating repetitive refactoring tasks, such as renaming variables or extracting functions

How can you refine the language of the generated documentation from ChatGPT?

To refine the language and quality of the documentation generated by ChatGPT, you can:

  • Provide specific prompts and guidelines for the desired tone, style, and level of detail
  • Review the generated documentation and provide feedback to the AI on areas that need improvement
  • Experiment with different prompting techniques, such as using examples or templates, to guide the AI’s output
  • Integrate the AI-generated documentation with your existing documentation processes and have human reviewers refine it further

What are some other ways in which AI can be used in software development besides generating code and documentation?

AI can be used in software development in various other ways, such as:

  • Automating software testing and quality assurance tasks
  • Analyzing and visualizing software metrics and performance data
  • Assisting with project management and task scheduling
  • Providing personalized recommendations for tools, libraries, and best practices
  • Enhancing developer productivity through intelligent code search and navigation

Conclusion

It was an interesting exercise to use ChatGPT for coding. However, from an overall ease-of-use and in-context help perspective, CoPilot seems to be clearly better than ChatGPT. This is particularly true because CoPilot will have a clearer picture of your existing codebase, and can therefore provide more targeted suggestions.